The fixed deposit interest rate scenario has slowed down, and the Indian investors have started looking at options other than the AAA rated bonds to earn higher returns. The AA and A-rated corporate bonds offer relatively high coupons compared to the government's securities with a couple of percentage points above. But the higher return will always be related to the higher risks; both go hand in hand in the bond market world. The main issue for the year 2026 is not the bond with higher return, but whether the yield is sufficient to justify the added risk involved.
AAA, AA and A Bond Ratings: What Sets Them Apart?
CRISIL, ICRA, CARE and India Ratings are some of the Indian credit rating agencies which evaluate the capacity of the issuer to meet its obligations of payment of principal and interest in a timely manner. AAA is the highest credit rating assigned by a rating agency and indicates its opinion that the issuer has the highest degree of safety regarding the timely servicing of financial obligations. It does not eliminate the possibility of default.
Rating | Default Risk | Typical Issuers | Borrowing Cost Impact |
AAA | Lowest | PSUs, large banks, blue-chip corporates | Lowest interest cost |
AA | Low | Established NBFCs, mid-large corporates | Moderate premium |
A | Low-to-moderate | Smaller corporates, some NBFCs | Higher premium |
Ratings influence borrowing costs directly: a lower rating forces issuers to offer higher coupons to attract investors, and it can also affect investor confidence during periods of market stress.
Why Lower-Rated Bonds Offer Higher Yields
The difference in yield between a corporate bond and risk-free government securities (G-Secs) is known as the credit spread. The credit spread is a compensation offered by the market for three different types of risk, viz. credit risk (risk of delay or default in payments), liquidity risk (difficulty in disposing of the instrument prior to maturity) and investor perception of the industry/issuer at that point in time. With a decrease in ratings from AAA, AA to A, all three risks increased.
How Credit Spreads Have Changed in 2026
The RBI's MPC has kept the repo rate unchanged at 5.25%, after having cut the rates from 6.50% cumulatively in the preceding year. This is the first MPC review to be done in August 2026. The G-Sec yield on 10 years was around 6.70% by early February 2026.
Noteworthy here is the fact that despite a reduction in policy rates, there has been no reduction in the corporate bond spread as anticipated. Yields on corporate NCDs have been reducing slower than government securities, resulting in higher credit spread relative to government securities on the basis of rating in 2026 compared to the historical average. Spread bands indicative of 2026 are:
- AAA: roughly 10–60 bps over G-Sec for PSU paper, and 50–140 bps for private/NBFC paper
- AA: roughly 100–260 bps
- A: roughly 260–460 bps
These spread levels can be equated to yields to maturity levels ranging between 7.0% and 8.3% for AAA-rated corporates, 8.0% and 9.5% for AA-rated corporates, and 9.5% and 11.5% for A-rated corporates. Such wide spreads point to a possible extra yield that may be greater than what was seen before, but it is due to the investor caution on corporates with lower ratings due to high government borrowings.
Is the Extra Yield Still Worth the Additional Credit Risk?
When the extra yield may justify the risk:
- The spread over AAA bonds is meaningful, not marginal
- Issuer fundamentals (cash flows, leverage, industry position) are demonstrably strong
- The investor has a long horizon and can hold to maturity
- The bond forms a small, diversified part of a larger portfolio
When it may not justify the risk:
- Spreads are historically narrow relative to the rating gap
- Issuer financials show weakening trends or high leverage
- The sector faces regulatory or cyclical uncertainty
- Secondary market liquidity is limited; the investor can find it difficult to exit easily
The core principle is risk-adjusted return, not nominal yield. A bond offering 11% may look attractive next to a 7.5% AAA bond, but if downgrade risk or illiquidity could wipe out several years of that extra coupon, the real return advantage reduces considerably.
Credit Ratings are Only One Part of the Investment Decision
These ratings represent only a beginning and not the whole story. Investors should consider how well the issuer can meet its debt obligations, its cash flows, the outlook for the industry, whether the bonds are secured or not, and maturity or duration characteristics. Two bonds that have the same rating can differ in yield due to the fact that one is secured while the other is not, or that one comes from a stable industry while the other comes from an industry facing cyclically adverse trends.
Which Rating Category May Align with Different Investment Objectives?
AAA bonds
AAA bonds generally suit investors prioritising capital preservation and predictable income, with lower yield in exchange for safety.
AA bonds
AA bonds may suit investors seeking a balance between reasonable income and manageable credit risk.
A bond
A bond may appeal to investors comfortable with higher volatility and credit risk looking for higher return potential, typically as a smaller portfolio allocation.
This is a matter of suitability based on individual risk appetite and goals, not a ranking of which is "better."
A Practical Checklist Before Chasing Higher Yield
Before investing in lower-rated bonds, consider:
- Is the additional yield meaningful relative to the additional risk, or just marginally higher?
- Can I financially absorb a rating downgrade or delayed payment?
- Is my overall portfolio diversified across issuers and sectors?
- Can I comfortably hold this bond until maturity if I cannot sell it easily?
Conclusion
The credit rating serves as a good starting point, but the investor must not rely on the credit rating alone while comparing two NCDs. The market environment of 2026 is such that the repo rate remains constant at 5.25% and credit spreads remain wide. Various parameters affect the actual yields, and investors who understand all these parameters will be able to make sound fixed income investment decisions.
FAQs on AAA vs AA vs A spreads in 2026
1. What is a good credit spread for corporate bonds in India?
There's no fixed "good" number; it depends on the rating and tenure. In 2026, AAA spreads of 50–140 bps, AA spreads of 100–260 bps, and A spreads of 260–460 bps over G-Secs are considered within typical market ranges.
2. Are AA-rated bonds safe in India?
AA-rated bonds are relatively low risk, and hence, they are considered safe investments, though they have greater default and liquidity risk compared to AAA rated bonds. It mostly depends on the financial standing of the company issuing the bond.
3. Can a bond's credit rating change after I invest?
Yes. Credit ratings of bonds can either be raised or reduced depending on the financial position of the bond issuer and evaluated periodically by rating agencies like CRISIL and ICRA.
4. Do bond yields fall when the RBI cuts interest rates?
Yes. But there could be an exception in case of corporate bonds whose yields may not come down as quickly as government securities' yields, and that's why the spread tends to stay high.
5. Should I choose AAA bonds over AA or A bonds for retirement savings?
AAA bonds are generally better choices for capital preservation and regular income flows. However, for those investors looking for extra yield, AA bonds could be a suitable choice.
Disclaimer:
The information contained in this newsletter (“Newsletter”) is for general informational purposes only. Northern Arc Capital Limited (“Northern Arc”) does not make any warranties about the completeness, reliability, and accuracy of this information. Any action you take upon the information contained in this Newsletter is strictly at your own risk, and Northern Arc will not be liable for any losses and damages in connection with the use of our Newsletter.
The data included in this Newsletter has been obtained from sources that are believed to be reliable and accurate at the time of publication. However, Northern Arc does not guarantee the accuracy or completeness of any information, nor does it assume any responsibility or liability for any errors or omissions therein. Any opinions expressed herein are subject to change without notice and Northern Arc is under no obligation to update or keep current the information contained in this Newsletter.
This Newsletter is not intended to constitute, and should not be construed as, investment advice or a recommendation to purchase, sell, or hold any security or to engage in any investment strategy or transaction. Readers should not rely solely on the information provided in this Newsletter for making investment decisions and should conduct their own due diligence or seek the advice of a qualified professional.
The content of this Newsletter is for informational purposes only and is not a solicitation or an offer to buy or sell any securities or financial instruments. Northern Arc is not responsible for any investment decisions made by the recipients of this Newsletter. Readers should take independent financial advice from a qualified professional in connection with, or independently research and verify, any information that is provided in this Newsletter and wish to rely upon, whether for the purpose of making an investment decision or otherwise.
Northern Arc and its affiliates, directors, employees, and agents expressly disclaim any and all liability for any direct or indirect losses, damages, or expenses of any kind arising out of or relating to the use of this Newsletter, including but not limited to, any losses related to the accuracy, completeness, timeliness, or reliability of such information.
This Newsletter may contain forward-looking statements that are based on current expectations, estimates, forecasts, and projections about the markets in which Northern Arc operates, as well as management’s beliefs and assumptions. Forward-looking statements are not guarantees of future performance and involve certain risks and uncertainties, which are difficult to predict. Past performance is not indicative of future results.
This report is intended solely for the recipient and is not for further circulation. Any distribution, modification, reproduction, or disclosure of the contents of this Newsletter, in whole or in part, without the prior written consent of Northern Arc, is strictly prohibited.